Top 24 Workable Alternatives to Improve Candidate Hiring & Tracking

Sep 8, 2025

Explore practical and workable alternatives for a more innovative, more efficient way of doing things.

Recruiting teams know the right software can make or break hiring efficiency, candidate quality, and team productivity. If Workable feels limiting, whether due to feature gaps, pricing, integrations, or scaling challenges, there are plenty of strong alternatives on the market. This guide explores the top Workable alternatives across applicant tracking systems, recruitment automation, and HR tech, helping you find a platform that better supports faster hiring, more innovative sourcing, and a smoother recruiter and candidate experience. Keep reading to learn how to Hire Offshore Developers

One standout option is Noxx’s AI recruiter, which streamlines sourcing and screening with automation that identifies stronger applicants, reduces time-to-hire, and allows recruiters to focus on meaningful candidate interactions instead of repetitive admin.

Why It’s Time to Consider a Workable Alternative

Workable is an applicant tracking system and HR platform built for small and mid-sized companies that need a simple, modern way to hire. It bundles recruiting, candidate tracking, AI-powered sourcing, a mobile app, and HRIS or payroll connections into a single system. Teams choose Workable for its intuitive interface and affordable plans. Still, hiring teams often look for other options when these factors become priorities:

Cost
Deeper feature needs
Complex workflows
Enterprise integrations

Why Teams Like Workable

Hands down, Workable earns praise for being affordable, easy to learn, and modern. The platform covers sourcing to offer management, while adding:

AI features
HRIS integrations
A native mobile app

Recruiters and hiring managers value the low friction from posting to screening and the straightforward administration that keeps daily work moving.

Core Features That Matter

Job posting and distribution: Post jobs to over 200 free and premium job boards simultaneously, expanding your reach quickly.
Multi-language hiring: Translate job posts, applications, and offers into six languages to support global hiring and attract multilingual candidate pools.
No code careers page builder: Build a branded, mobile-friendly careers site with custom layout, colors, fonts, and media to match employer brand.
Candidate database and AI sourcing: Utilize AI-powered matching to identify likely candidates and manage talent pools within a single recruiting CRM.
Collaboration and communication tools: Sync calendars and email, share profiles, set role-based permissions, and run virtual interviews with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams.
Automation and workflow: Automate repetitive tasks with custom email templates, candidate SMS messaging, and hiring pipelines tailored to standard processes.
Payroll integration: Generate payroll reports, automate calculations, and sync with major providers like ADP and Xero for multi-state and multi-country payroll needs.

When Workable Becomes a Bottleneck

Scaling and agencies: Workable can feel limiting for organizations that hire at high volume or run multiple hiring teams. As headcount and hiring complexity grow, the platform’s simplicity may create friction for advanced reporting, shared pipelines, and agency-style workflows.
Customization limits: Companies that require deep workflow customization, unique approval gates, or complex permissions often hit the product ceiling. Custom fields, bespoke forms, and tailored candidate journeys are not as flexible as some competitors.
AI performance gaps: Workable’s AI-powered tools still need refinement. Several users report missed matches or inconsistent candidate ratings, which forces manual review and extra screening work.
Application design and employer brand: The application layout is basic and may not effectively showcase the employer brand. For roles that attract top talent, a richer candidate experience and branded application flow matter.

What to Look for in Workable Alternatives

Scalability and performance: Seek systems built for high candidate volume and many concurrent users. Look for recruiting platforms that maintain speed and reliability as headcount, openings, and integrations grow.
Greater workflow customization: Prioritize tools that enable you to build custom pipelines, incorporate conditional logic, define approval steps, and assign roles that align with your company's actual hiring processes.
Advanced AI and automation: Favor vendors that show continuous model improvements, transparent candidate scoring, and automation that reduces manual screening without raising false negatives.
Better employer branding and candidate experience: Choose a solution with flexible application forms, rich job pages, and a careers site editor that reflects company culture and improves conversion.
Deep integrations and API access: Confirm integration coverage with HRIS, payroll, calendar, sourcing tools, background checks, and Single Sign On. Robust APIs help connect recruiting data to finance and people ops.
Recruitment CRM and sourcing features: Look for talent pools, proactive sourcing workflows, outreach sequencing, and analytics that let you reuse candidates and measure channel efficiency.
Reporting and analytics: Ensure the ATS supplies customizable dashboards, funnel metrics, time-to-hire breakdowns, and exportable data for people operations and finance.
Security and compliance: Check data residency, role-based access, audit logs, and compliance features for hiring across regions.

Questions to Ask While Comparing Applicant Tracking System Alternatives

How many hires per month will you process, and how many users need concurrent access?
Which HR systems, payroll providers, or background check vendors must integrate with your ATS?
Do you need custom approval gates, multi-team pipelines, or agency partner workflows?
How vital is branded candidate experience versus speed of deployment?
How will you validate AI candidate recommendations, and what controls do you need for bias and accuracy?
What reporting will finance and people ops require, and how do you plan to extract that data?

Which hiring problem are you currently solving, and which of these features would make an immediate impact on your day-to-day operations?

Top 24 Workable Alternatives for Intuitive Recruiting

1. Noxx: Hire the Right Person in Days, Not Months

Noxx uses AI to screen large applicant pools automatically and surface the best fits for your roles. It is an AI recruiter that finds top candidates fast and affordably. It serves startups and growing teams that need engineers, marketers, and sales professionals without paying hefty upfront recruiter fees. The platform screens over 1,000 applicants, shows salary expectations up front, and returns a ranked top 10 within seven days so hiring teams can move from posting to offer quickly.

Why Noxx Is A Good Workable Alternative

Compared with Greenhouse, Noxx focuses on speed and cost efficiency over deep hiring program management. Where Greenhouse emphasizes structured interview workflows and integrations, Noxx replaces lengthy sourcing and screening with automated candidate discovery and fee‑only‑on‑hire pricing. If you're looking for an applicant tracking alternative that eliminates heavy sourcing work and reduces hiring costs, Noxx offers a practical, transactional model and direct candidate readiness.

Features

AI screening of 1,000+ applicants
Salary expectation display
Top 10 ranked candidates in 7 days
Pay‑only‑on‑hire pricing

Integrations

Job description upload
Applicant import
Candidate communication tools

Pros

Extremely low upfront cost and risk
Fast time to shortlist
Clear salary transparency for candidates and hiring teams

Cons

Less focus on long-term employer brand management
Fewer enterprise integrations than mature ATS platforms

2. Kula: Centralize Hiring with Automation and a Clean Dashboard

Kula is an ATS and recruiting CRM built to automate sourcing, outreach, scheduling, and scoring. It is an all-in-one ATS that speeds hiring up to five times. It suits growth companies that need a single place to run campaigns, engage passive candidates, and manage pipelines without adding multiple tools. Core strengths include sourcing automation, AI interview intelligence, and natural language reporting for quick insights.

Why Kula is a Good Workable Alternative

Kula offers an intuitive UI and monthly AI model audits that keep scoring accurately, which contrasts with Greenhouse’s focus on structured workflows. For teams switching from Workable, Kula adds stronger automated outreach and a conversational analytics layer to query hiring performance faster than typical ATS reporting.

Features

Sourcing automation and CRM
AI interview intelligence and scoring
Built-in scheduling
Conversational AI reporting

Integrations

LinkedIn
GitHub
Calendar sync
ATS sync
Major data vendors

Pros

Strong automation across sourcing and outreach
Easy for non-technical users
Regular AI tuning for accuracy

Cons

May require setup to align scoring with company competencies
Advanced customization can add configuration time

3. Greenhouse: Structure Interviews and Reduce Bias in Hiring

Greenhouse provides tools for creating repeatable hiring processes, collaborative scorecards, and robust job and candidate management for companies scaling hiring. It is best for structured hiring processes. It serves mid-sized and enterprise teams that need consistent evaluation and compliance controls. Strengths include scalable workflows, candidate engagement channels, and an ecosystem of integrations.

Why Greenhouse is a Good Workable Alternative

As an alternative to Workable, Greenhouse emphasizes structured interviewing and fairness, helping teams standardize scorecards and feedback. Compared to other options, Greenhouse offers deeper workflow controls and established integrations that help organizations formalize hiring practices while maintaining a consistent candidate experience.

Features

Structured interview workflows
AI sourcing tools
A candidate texting solution

Integrations

LinkedIn
Indeed
Glassdoor
ZipRecruiter
Slack
Docusign
Google Calendar
Outlook
Zoom
Asana

Pros

Strong support for structured, fair hiring
Broad partner ecosystem
Scalable for enterprise needs

Cons

Implementation requires process discipline
Cost can grow with enterprise feature usage

4. Deel: Hire Anywhere While Handling Compliance and Pay

Deel helps companies hire employees and contractors in:

150+ countries
Handling contracts
Taxes
Payroll compliance

It is best for global talent hiring and payroll. It serves companies expanding internationally or building remote teams who need country-specific employment support. Core strengths lie in global payroll, legal compliance, and recruiter networks for local sourcing.

Why Deel is a Good Workable Alternative:

When compared to Greenhouse, Deel focuses less on structured interview frameworks and more on enabling compliant global employment after you find talent. As an alternative to Workable, Deel offers payroll and contractor management features that Workable lacks, making it a better fit for teams requiring global hiring and post-hire administration.

Features

Multi-currency payroll
Contract templates
Tax and visa support
Onboarding and offboarding workflows

Integrations

QuickBooks
Slack
Google Workspace
BambooHR
Workday
Brex
Xero

Pros

End-to-end global hiring and payroll support
Reduces legal and payroll friction across countries
Network of vetted local recruiters

Cons

Not focused on interview workflow design
Pricing can reflect local compliance service levels

5. Manatal: Tailor Your ATS to Match Your Hiring Brand

Manatal blends AI candidate recommendations, social media enrichment, and customizable career pages to support recruiters and hiring managers. It is best for customizing recruitment workflows. It serves agencies and mid-sized companies that want configurable application forms and intelligent shortlists. Strengths include easy branding, resume parsing, and candidate scoring that adapts to your process.

Why Manatal Is A Good Workable Alternative

Versus Greenhouse, Manatal emphasizes customization and aggressive AI recommendations while keeping costs predictable. As a Workable alternative, Manatal provides teams with more design control over career pages and applicant forms, while also offering strong social enrichment to surface candidate details more quickly.

Features

Candidate scoring and recommendations
Real-time collaboration
Social media enrichment
Customizable reporting

Integrations

LinkedIn
Indeed
Monster
Talent.com
Google for Jobs
Glassdoor
Google Suite
Microsoft 365

Pros

Flexible branding and application forms
Useful AI-driven candidate matches
Affordable for growing teams

Cons

Some integrations require extra setup
Reporting depth may lag enterprise platforms

6. Pinpoint: Build Relationships that Convert Passive Talent Faster

Pinpoint focuses on nurturing candidates over time with automated messages, pipelines, and detailed analytics. It is best for candidate nurturing and DEI insights. It serves organizations with long hiring cycles and DEI goals that need to engage talent consistently. The platform’s strengths are candidate lifecycle automation, diversity reporting, and automated scoring to surface priority applicants.

Why Pinpoint is a Good Workable Alternative

Compared with Greenhouse, Pinpoint delivers stronger built-in nurturing and diversity reporting that supports long-term talent pipelines. As a Workable alternative, it replaces manual candidate follow-up with persistent automated engagement and clearer DEI analytics to measure progress.Features

Automated candidate messaging
Custom hiring pipelines
Onboarding tools
Branded careers pages

Integrations

Asana
Trello
PowerBI
Checkr
Sterling
ADP
BambooHR
Microsoft Teams
Glassdoor
Indeed
Slack

Pros

Deep candidate nurturing tools
Good DEI reporting and analytics
Scales for enterprise recruitment programs

Cons

The setup for automated flows can be detailed
Some modules may require training to use effectively

7. Boon: Turn Referrals into a Measurable Growth Channel

Boon gamifies employee referrals and automates referral tracking to surface passive talent inside existing networks. It is best for gamified employee referrals. It serves companies that want higher referral engagement and easier rewards management. Strengths include:

Branded referral campaigns
AI candidate matching
Multilingual support for global teams

Why Boon is a Good Workable Alternative

Versus Greenhouse, Boon focuses on referral-driven hiring and employee engagement, with a particular emphasis on gamification that Greenhouse does not offer. As an alternative to Workable, Boon reduces reliance on job boards by boosting referral pipeline quality and tracking conversion more transparently.

Features

Gamified referral campaigns
AI candidate matching
Reward management
Multilingual support

Integrations

Jobvite
Bullhorn
SmartRecruiters
ZipRecruiter
iCIMS
Zenefits
Gusto
Slack
Microsoft Teams

Pros

Raises employee engagement for referrals
Good analytics on referral ROI
Easy to deploy across brands and regions

Cons

Focused on referrals rather than full ATS functionality
Rewards program management can add administrative overhead

8. JazzHR: Grow Hiring Capability Affordably with Modular Tools

JazzHR provides core ATS functionality with transparent pricing and optional add-ons for texting, eSignatures, and reporting. It is best for flexible, affordable add-ons. It serves small and mid-sized businesses that want control over costs and modular features. Core strengths include:

Easy job posting
Candidate texting
Visual reporting

Why Jazzhr is a Good Workable Alternative

Compared to Greenhouse, JazzHR keeps costs predictable and lets teams add only the features they need. As a Workable alternative, it provides smaller recruiting teams with straightforward workflows and useful add-ons, all without imposing enterprise-level complexity.

Features

Job posting and syndication
Candidate texting
Offer eSignatures
Visual reporting

Integrations

LinkedIn Recruiter
Monster
CareerBuilder
ADP
BambooHR
Gusto
G Suite Calendar

Pros

Transparent pricing and modular features
Friendly for SMB budgets
Simple candidate communication tools

Cons

Lacks some enterprise-scale integrations
Advanced reporting requires add-ons

9. SeekOut: Find Candidates Others Miss with Better Search

SeekOut uses machine learning and natural language processing to craft deep candidate profiles and enable precise outreach. It is best for deep semantic search and targeting. It serves talent acquisition and in-house recruiting teams that need to target niche skills and passive talent. Strengths include:

Advanced search
Talent rediscovery
Pipeline insights

Why Seekout is a Good Workable Alternative

When placed against Greenhouse, SeekOut excels at sourcing and building rich candidate profiles before you bring them into an ATS. As a Workable alternative, it provides superior external sourcing and semantic search to feed higher-quality candidates into hiring workflows.

Features

Semantic candidate search
Talent rediscovery
Applicant review
Pipeline insights

Integrations

LinkedIn
GitHub
Workday
SAP SuccessFactors
Greenhouse
Lever
iCIMS
BambooHR

Pros

Exceptional passive candidate discovery
Strong for technical and niche roles
Integrates with major ATS tools

Cons

Cost can be high for smaller teams
Learning curve for advanced search queries

10. Eightfold.ai Talent Acquisition: Use AI to Match Skills to Roles and Reduce Bias

Eightfold.ai applies machine learning to source, match, and engage candidates with explainable recommendations and skills-based matching. It is best for AI-driven talent insights. It serves large enterprises and talent teams that need continuous talent intelligence and internal mobility. Core strengths are:

Skill mapping
Talent rediscovery
Analytics for inclusive hiring

Why Eightfold.ai is a Good Workable Alternative

Compared to Greenhouse, Eightfold emphasizes AI-driven talent intelligence and explainable matches that inform hiring choices. As an alternative to Workable, it gives organizations a stronger skills foundation and better tools for rediscovering internal candidates for open roles.

Features

AI-powered sourcing and skill matching
Talent rediscovery
Personalized candidate engagement
Diversity hiring tools

Integrations

LinkedIn
Workday
SAP SuccessFactors
Greenhouse
Lever
iCIMS
ADP
BambooHR

Pros

Deep AI-driven recommendations with explainability
Strong for internal mobility and skills mapping
Good diversity analytics

Cons

Implementation can be resource-intensive
Pricing aligned to enterprise scale

11. Workday Talent Management: Map, Measure, and Grow Skills Across Your Workforce

Workday Talent Management integrates talent acquisition with learning and career development using AI to assess skills and suggest growth paths. It is best for AI-driven skills intelligence. It serves medium to large enterprises that want a unified HR and talent system. Strengths include:

Skills
Intelligence
Personalized learning
Agile career tool

Why Workday is a Good Workable Alternative

Against Greenhouse, Workday brings a broader HRIS foundation and deeper skills analytics that connect hiring to development. As a Workable alternative, it suits organizations that want recruiting tightly linked to learning and workforce planning rather than a standalone ATS.

Features

AI and ML-driven skills intelligence
Personalized learning
Career development tools
Talent optimization

Integrations

Salesforce
Microsoft Teams
Slack
LinkedIn
Google Workspace
ServiceNow
SAP
Oracle
ADP

Pros

Unified HR and talent platform
Strong skills and learning linkage
Scales across large organizations

Cons

Complexity requires HR and IT alignment
Cost and implementation time are high

12. LinkedIn Talent Solutions: Find and Reach Candidates Across the World’s Largest Professional Graph

LinkedIn Talent Solutions leverages LinkedIn’s network, search filters, and messaging to identify and engage active and passive candidates. It is best for access to a massive professional network. It serves recruiters of every size who want real-time professional data and a broad reach. Strengths include:

Advanced filters
Intelligent matching
Candidate pipeline tools

Why LinkedIn is a Good Workable Alternative

Compared with Greenhouse, LinkedIn adds the raw sourcing power of a large professional network and direct messaging. As an alternative to Workable, it supplies real-time candidate signals and superior targeting that feed hiring workflows and ATS systems.

Features

Advanced search filters
Intelligent matching
Personalized messaging
Pipeline management

Integrations

Microsoft Office 365
Google Workspace
Workday
SAP SuccessFactors
Greenhouse
Lever
iCIMS

Pros

Massive candidate reach and data
Best for targeted outreach and employer branding
Tight integrations with ATS platforms

Cons

Cost can escalate for active sourcing
Candidate contact volumes require a disciplined outreach strategy

13. Lever: Coordinate Hiring Across Teams and Keep Candidates Engaged

Lever combines an ATS with a CRM to support collaborative hiring, pipeline outreach, and reporting for mid-sized and larger companies. It is known for collaborative hiring with CRM + ATS. It suits teams that prioritize candidate experience and ongoing talent relationships. Strengths include:

Pipeline visibility
Branded career pages
Built-in SMS

Why Lever Is A Good Workable Alternative:

Versus Greenhouse, Lever integrates CRM capabilities more deeply into the recruiting workflow, making it easier to build relationships with candidates over time. As a Workable alternative, Lever offers strong candidate engagement tools and a user-friendly interface that supports outreach and conversion.

Features

Real-time pipeline insights
Custom career sites
Targeted outreach
Scheduling
SMS communication

Integrations

300+ HR tools, including:

Slack
Google
Outlook
Background check and assessment vendors

Pros

Intuitive interface and mobile-friendly pages
Strong CRM style candidate nurturing
Robust integration ecosystem

Cons

Higher cost for startups
Reporting customization can require multiple report pulls

14. Ashby: Fast Setup, Modern Dashboards, and Responsive Support

Ashby delivers end-to-end ATS capabilities with automation, scheduling, and analytics for small to mid-sized companies. It is best for fast-growing teams that want modern ATS UX. It serves teams that want quick visibility into hiring performance and customizable hiring workflows. Strengths include:

Data-rich dashboards
Smart scheduling
Frequent product updates

Why Ashby Is A Good Workable Alternative

When compared to Greenhouse, Ashby offers a modern interface and very responsive support, which helps teams iterate faster on processes. As a Workable alternative, it suits internal recruiting teams seeking a contemporary ATS with flexible pipelines and quick onboarding.

Features

Data-rich dashboards
Centralized communication
Intelligent scheduling and time zone automation
Automation for assessments

Integrations

Gmail
Google Calendar
Slack
Job boards
Assessment tools

Pros

Fast, personalized customer support
Frequent product improvements
Adjustable workflows for internal recruiting

Cons

Less suited for agencies
Some technical reporting elements can be challenging for non-technical users

15. Screenloop: Turn Interviews Into Data You Can Act On

Screenloop focuses on interview intelligence, automated scorecards, and interviewer enablement to improve hiring decisions. It is best for interview intelligence and interviewer training. It serves small and mid-sized teams that want consistent evaluation and interviewer calibration. Strengths include:

AI-generated notes
Self-scheduling
Interviewer training modules

Why Screenloop Is A Good Workable Alternative

Compared with Greenhouse, Screenloop adds richer interview transcription, AI notes, and interviewer training designed to reduce bias and improve consistency. As a Workable alternative, it brings a sharper focus on interview quality and actionable feedback for hiring teams.

Features

Custom application forms
Self-scheduling
AI-powered interview notes and scorecards
Candidate surveys
Interviewer training

Integrations

Calendar sync
Slack
HRIS
Background check vendors

Pros

Clean UX with minimal learning curve
Strong interviewer training and compliance tools
Fast setup for interview workflows

Cons

Limited customization in onboarding checklists and reports
Filtering can be constrained on very large candidate volumes

16. Breezy HR: Make Interviews Easy and Widen Your Candidate Net

Breezy HR offers comprehensive ATS functionality, emphasizing easy scheduling and DEI-oriented job posting. It is best for scheduling and inclusive recruiting. It serves small and mid-sized businesses that need straightforward pipelines, calendar sync, and multichannel job posting. Core strengths include:

Team scheduling
Candidate self-scheduling
Diversity-focused job distribution

Why Breezy HH Is A Good Workable Alternative

Versus Greenhouse, Breezy HR simplifies scheduling with side-by-side availability views and broader job board reach for DEI sites. As a Workable alternative, it reduces friction in interview coordination and improves access to diverse candidate pools.

Features

Native self-scheduling
Team availability scheduling
DEI-focused job posting
Saved interview notes
Customized pipelines

Integrations

Google Calendar
Outlook
Indeed
LinkedIn
ZipRecruiter
Zoom

Pros

Superior scheduling tools for interview teams
Focus on DEI job boards improves reach
Simple candidate note storage and sharing

Cons

Less depth in enterprise-scale reporting
Some advanced automation may be limited

17. BambooHR: Merge HRIS and Recruiting For Cleaner Handoffs

BambooHR provides recruiting features inside a full HRIS offering, giving SMBs applicant tracking, plus onboarding and HR records. It is best for HR and recruiting to be in one system. It serves companies that want one system for hiring and employee lifecycle management. Strengths include:

Job description templates
Offer letter templates
Straightforward onboarding path

Why BambooHR Is A Good Workable Alternative

Compared to Greenhouse, BambooHR positions hiring inside a broader HR function, so teams can continue the employee journey without exporting data. As a Workable alternative, it works well for companies that need recruiting plus HRIS capabilities in one platform.

Features

Job description templates
Candidate notes
Offer templates
Onboarding workflows

Integrations

Payroll and accounting tools
ATS connectors
Google Workspace
Slack

Pros

Smooth transition from recruiting to HR processes
Useful templates for job posts and offers
Friendly for SMB HR teams

Cons

Hiring and onboarding features are available only on higher tiers
Less depth in advanced sourcing and recruitment marketing

18. Zoho Recruit: Automate Candidate Flows and Improve Resume Matching

Zoho Recruit provides workflow automation, resume management, and AI candidate matching through Zia. It is best for automated pipelines and nuanced AI. It serves businesses that want customizable triggers and more intelligent resume parsing. Strengths include:

Automated candidate progression
Robust resume analytics
Multi-channel posting

Why Zoho Recruit Is A Good Workable Alternative

In comparison to Greenhouse, Zoho Recruit emphasizes automated workflows that reliably move candidates through stages and an AI engine that scores resumes beyond keywords. As a Workable alternative, it delivers nuanced AI matching and pipeline automation often at a lower price point.

Features

Automated candidate pipelines
AI-powered candidate matching
Resume parsing
Multi-channel job posting

Integrations

Zoho ecosystem
Google Workspace,
Job boards
HRIS
Payroll tools

Pros

Robust automation for candidate movement
Flexible AI matching and parsing
Competitive pricing

Cons

Advanced AI features require higher plan tiers
The setup of complex automations takes care and testing

19. Qureos: Source, Screen, and Message Candidates in Hours

Qureos uses an AI named Iris to create job descriptions, post across 100+ job boards, and run multilingual outreach sequences. It is best for rapid AI screening and multilingual outreach. It serves recruiters and hiring teams that need speed and personalized candidate engagement in multiple languages. Strengths include:

Rapid time to source
AI video interview analysis
Multilingual messaging

Why Qureos Is A Good Workable Alternative

Compared with Greenhouse, Qureos compresses sourcing and initial screening into hours with AI-driven outreach and interview evaluation. As a Workable alternative, it accelerates candidate discovery and initial assessment, giving hiring teams a faster funnel into structured interviews.

Features

100+ job board postings
AI screening and outreach
Multilingual messaging
AI video interview evaluation

Integrations

Email and LinkedIn outreach
Job board connectors
Applicant import

Pros

Dramatically reduces time to source candidates
Multilingual outreach scales global hiring
AI video provides objective candidate summaries

Cons

Heavy reliance on AI for initial decisions
Integration depth with the enterprise ATS may vary

20. Jobvite: Combine Employer Brand And Pipeline Management In One Suite

Jobvite provides an integrated talent acquisition suite that covers recruitment marketing, ATS, referrals, onboarding, and analytics. It is best for integrated recruitment marketing and ATS. It serves companies seeking cohesive employer branding and candidate experience across the funnel. Strengths include:

Employer branding tools
Onboarding workflows
Industry benchmark analytics

Why Jobvite Is A Good Workable Alternative

Versus Greenhouse, Jobvite blends recruitment marketing more tightly into the applicant tracking flow to attract and convert candidates. As a Workable alternative, it offers a full suite that connects marketing, referrals, and ATS data for better talent attraction.

Features

Employer branding
Recruitment marketing
ATS
Onboarding
Referral programs
Analytics

Integrations

Job boards
HRIS
Background checks
CRM
Communication tools

Pros

Strong focus on employer brand and candidate journey
Unified suite reduces tool sprawl
Good analytics for benchmarking

Cons

Suite breadth can be more than small teams need
Implementation complexity scales with the features used

21. Bullhorn: Power Large Staffing Operations With A Single System

Bullhorn combines ATS, CRM, and VMS functionality for enterprise staffing and recruiting agencies. It is built for high-performance recruiting teams. It serves high-volume recruiters who need customizable workflows, real-time reporting, and mobile recruiting. Strengths include:

Robust placement tracking
Configurable dashboards
Strong agency features

Why Bullhorn Is A Good Workable Alternative

Compared to Greenhouse, Bullhorn focuses on the high-volume and placement workflows that staffing agencies require. As an alternative to Workable, it supports complex agency needs and scales with large sourcing and claims processes.

Features

Requisition and candidate tracking
Real-time reporting
ATS
CRM
VMS ecosystem
Mobile recruiting

Integrations

Job boards
VMS
Payroll and HR systems
Mobile apps

Pros

Built to scale for staffing agencies
Highly configurable and proven in high-volume settings
Strong placement workflow features

Cons

Not ideal for single company internal recruiting only
Can be expensive and require dedicated admins

22. Jobdiva: Turn Data into Faster Placements and Tighter Compliance

JobDiva offers AI-enabled resume harvesting, job matching, and in-depth reporting designed for industries where compliance and timing matter. It is a data-driven recruiting with deep analytics. It serves agencies and large recruiters that need automated compliance checks and performance dashboards. Strengths include:

Automated resume intake
Skill-based filtering
Job board connectivity

Why Jobdiva is a Good Workable Alternative

Versus Greenhouse, JobDiva adds stronger compliance checks and data-driven decision support for high-volume industries. As a Workable alternative, it works well where rapid placements and regulatory tracking are critical to delivery.

Features

AI resume harvesting
Skill-based filtering
Automated compliance checks
Applicant tracking tied to VMS

Integrations

Job boards
VMS systems
Compliance vendors
Payroll connectors

Pros

Strong analytics for performance monitoring
Good compliance and industry-focused features
Automates resume intake at scale

Cons

The interface can feel dated to some users
Best value appears at scale

23. CEIPAL: Get Automation and Sourcing Without a Big Price Tag

CEIPAL offers AI resume parsing, shortlisting, and one-click job board posting for budget-conscious recruiters and HR teams. It is an affordable AI-driven recruiting for fast growth. It serves firms scaling quickly that need automation without large license fees. Strengths include:

Employee referral tracking
Document workflows
Social sourcing

Why CEIPAL is a Good Workable Alternative

Compared with Greenhouse, CEIPAL targets cost-sensitive teams but still provides AI-driven shortlisting and board distribution. As a Workable alternative, it strikes a balance between automation and affordability, catering to teams that require scalable features without the high cost of an enterprise solution.

Features

AI resume parsing and shortlisting
One-click job posting
Referral tracking
Onboarding workflows

Integrations

Job boards
Background checks
Payroll
HRIS tools

Pros

Competitive pricing with useful automation
Scales for growing recruiting teams
Suitable for agencies and fast-scaling firms

Cons

The user interface may lack polish compared to premium platforms
Some integrations need extra configuration

24. Recruitee: Give Teams Control with Custom Pipelines and Permissions

Recruitee empowers hiring managers and recruiters with collaborative hiring tools, role-based permissions, and sourcing extensions. It is best for collaborative, flexible hiring across teams. It serves multi-team companies that want autonomy and structure together. Strengths include:

Custom workflows per department
Internal mobility tools
Chrome sourcing extension

Why Recruitee is a Good Workable Alternative

Compared to Greenhouse, Recruitee offers teams greater flexibility in designing hiring pipelines, while also enforcing role-based access and ensuring compliance. As a Workable alternative, it supports decentralized hiring with central governance, helping companies scale hiring across many teams.

Features

Custom hiring workflows
Role-based permissions
Internal mobility and referral tools
Sourcing Chrome extension

Integrations

Job boards
Slack
Calendar
HRIS systems
Assessment providers

Pros

Flexible per team workflows with central controls
Easy collaboration for hiring teams
Good sourcing extension for quick candidate capture

Cons

Advanced reporting can require extra setup
Some enterprise-scale integrations are limited without custom work

Upload a Job and Get 10 Candidates within 7 Days with Noxx (No Risk, No Upfront Fees)

Noxx runs an AI recruiter that scans and ranks candidates so you see the best matches quickly. The system automatically screens over 1,000 applicants and returns the top 10 candidates within seven days. That speed comes from automated resume parsing, skill scoring, and relevance ranking tied to your job description.

Pay Only When You Hire

You pay $300 only if you make a hire. There are no upfront fees and no recruiter commissions that add surprise costs. This shifts hiring risk away from your budget and onto performance.

Screening Scale and Automation That Works

The platform automates bulk screening, skills tests, and initial qualification interviews. Automation removes the manual bottleneck recruiters create and preserves human review for final fit and culture checks. How often do hiring teams wish they could eliminate repetitive candidate triage?

Salary Transparency Before You Talk

Noxx shows salary expectations up front so you can match budget to market immediately. Candidates disclose or are matched to expected pay ranges, helping you avoid wasted interviews and missed offers. That clarity speeds decision-making and removes awkward negotiations later.

Focus Roles: Engineers, Marketers, and Sales People

Noxx targets engineers, marketers, and sales professionals with role-specific screening flows. For engineers, it assesses technical skills and project history. For marketers, it weighs campaign outcomes and content skills. For sales, it evaluates pipeline experience and quota success.

Savings versus US Market Rates

You can reduce labor costs by up to 70 percent compared to typical US rates without sacrificing quality. Noxx locates qualified talent in lower-cost regions and validates skills through automated assessments and portfolio checks. That approach gives you savings that go straight to product development or growth.

How to Use the System in Minutes

Upload your job description, set a salary range, and specify the required skills, then let the AI run the search. The platform handles sourcing, screening, and candidate shortlisting. You review the top 10 matches and choose who to interview.

Features That Replace Costly Recruiting Options

Noxx combines candidate sourcing, applicant tracking, automated testing, and interview scheduling in one platform. It reduces dependency on:

Staffing agencies
Headhunters
Freelance marketplaces

You maintain control over hiring while offloading time-consuming tasks.

Quality Control and Vetting Methods

Candidates face structured skill checks, portfolio reviews, and automated background checks. Human reviewers spot check top candidates to validate fit and technical claims. The result is a signal-to-noise ratio that matches small teams and growth-stage companies.

How Noxx Compares with Workable Alternatives

Compared with recruitment agencies, applicant tracking systems, and freelance platforms, Noxx emphasizes:

Speed
Cost efficiency
Outcome-based pricing

It blends recruitment automation, talent sourcing, and marketplace elements without long-term contracts or high commissions. Which hiring platform offers a trial that only pays out if it results in a hire?

Use Cases Where Noxx Excels

Startups that need engineers fast. Marketing teams building growth capabilities on a budget. Sales organizations are scaling pipelines across time zones. The platform fits teams that:

Value speed
Measurable vetting
Predictable hiring spend

Questions to Ask Before You Switch Platforms

What are the candidate quality metrics, and how are they measured?
How does the platform handle follow-up and contract terms?
Can the system integrate with your existing HR tools and calendars?

Answers to these questions clarify operational fit and reduce surprises.